Background

For example, when comparing conventional currencies with INTERCURRENCY, the existing currencies are monetary systems based on artificial arrangements, so the existence of the institutions themselves is essential, and the conventional notion is that "without a state, a currency cannot be generated." In this regard, the concept of the trilemma of international finance has traditionally been the concept that "as long as the international financial system is a currency system (economic system), it is impossible to break through the barrier of the system." However, INTERCURRENCY is unique in that it is possible to endogenously and independently function the currency and the economic zone without relying on the system.

For example, a modern monetary system based on forced access, exchange, and SWIFT cannot create a unified economic zone based on the common currencies of mankind, and "there will be no end to economic conflicts between nations." However, this common sense does not apply to a monetary system based on INTERCURRENCY.

For example, it is said that 5,000 years have passed since the so-called "money" monetary system was created, but it has not been proved that there was no monetary system as a value exchange medium in human history before that. In this regard, unexpected hypotheses emerge when we consider the links between the monetary system as a INTERCURRENCY and the monetary system more than 5,000 years ago in terms of community-and language-based appraisal societies.

For example, when observing businesses in terms of return on equity (ROE), it is not possible to have an ROE that exceeds a certain limit, but the ROE of a MAXELE Inc. with a complete Seigniorage may not be known to anyone.

This is just one example of this project, but it is thought that a variety of comments and new hypotheses may arise from each viewpoint. Therefore, we decided to solicit reviews from a wide range of people. In principle, the review will be posted on this site without delay together with photos.

Background

For example, as with the founder, passion-based research is risky. And they are not enthusiastic about risk-free research. In addition, although there is a saying that three or more people use Monju wisdom, researchers who are pushing on the road to sharpening their minds struggle only to find someone to discuss.

For example, industrial research tends to lead to economic value because it is directly related to economic activity, while social research tends not to lead to economic value because it is articulated. As a result, when we push forward with social research with enthusiasm, we are constantly under pressure to secure budgets.

For example, commercial research on economic activities is conducted in a closed room covered with concrete, but the place where ideas can be generated is not necessarily that. In light of the fact that the inspiration of researchers is closely linked to each other's lives, research should be conducted in a manner that varies greatly.

This is just one example, but it can be said that the environment in which research supporting the progress of civilization and the sustainable development of society as a whole is promoted as a whole is still developing. MAXELE NET® aims to be a global symposium as a research network in which guild members share risks and profit.

Background

For example, our business foundation is written on this site, including the content of the invention, and related intellectual property rights. Capital is extremely vulnerable, and project members are limited to the founder and a few people around it. We've consistently refined our core competencies, but we have nothing else.

For example, the cost of deploying intellectual property rights to protect the core competencies of a project as an intellectual property portfolio in more countries is burdensome. Compared to the size of the project, the costs required are incredibly low, but they can still overwhelm the project.

For example, a company has a production department that conducts production. In this respect, even IT companies have production sectors such as coding and system management, but we have only the sectors that generate ideas and the sectors that legally manage the ideas created. This shows that we cannot provide society with ideas created and solutions based on intellectual property rights.

Thus, MAXELE Inc. needs partners that can share missions. We are working hard to forge strategic partnerships to create a value for the future.

Background

For example, MAXELE Inc. has not yet established a board of directors. This is due to the fact that the number of directors does not meet the required number to establish a board of directors. This is also due to the fact that it has not received funding from VC, etc. and that MAXELE Inc. has been doing all that it has done from its establishment to the present day, including research, on a founder-only basis.

For example, the founder's power is limited in part. In the previous phases of MAXELE project, the project could be promoted only by the limited strength of the founders, but in the future, the strengths that the founder have not been able to achieve will probably be required. We look forward to the establishment of a board of directors and the participation of board members who are capable of exercising their capabilities to the fullest.

For example, a project has a stage. For MAXELE project, this is also true, with stages changing rapidly according to stage. This is similar to the process in which an insect changes from an egg to a larva and then goes through a pupa to become an adult. Each of these processes is part of the cycle that leads to the next one, and each has its own role in something. MAXELE project is about to hatch.

Thus, MAXELE Inc. requires board members to share risks based on their visions. In order to create a future-oriented value, we aspire to meet companions who can run together.